Bra Fitting Encyclopedia
Between Sizes: When Measurements Don't Line Up
The nearest-even band rounding rule gives a starting point, but it does not work perfectly for everyone. This page covers what to do when your measurements fall between sizes or your ribcage profile is unusual, and it documents every place sizing sources disagree.
Snug vs. tight underbust: how compressible is your ribcage?
The difference between your snug and very-tight underbust measurements tells you how compressible your ribcage is:
| Snug minus tight underbust | What it suggests |
|---|---|
| Less than 2 inches | Firm ribcage. You may prefer to size up to the next even band for comfort. |
| 2 to 4 inches | Average compressibility. The nearest-even rule should work well. |
| More than 4 inches | Compressible ribcage. You may prefer to size down for a snugger, more supportive fit. |
Smaller vs. larger bands
| Band range | What to know when between sizes |
|---|---|
| 32 and under | Less fabric and less stretch, so these bands can feel tighter at the same snugness. Rounding up may be more comfortable. |
| 36 and above | More fabric and more stretch. Rounding down may provide better support. |
How this compares to the r/ABraThatFits calculator
The ABTF community calculator uses a more nuanced algorithm that considers all six measurements rather than simple nearest-even rounding. It generally selects a band size near the snug underbust, often about 2 inches larger than the tight measurement, and uses a +0 approach. If you are between sizes or have an unusual ribcage profile, the ABTF calculator may give a more tailored result. You can use it at abrathatfits.org/calculator.
Sizing conflicts and how they were reconciled
Different sources sometimes disagree on sizing details. This encyclopedia documents the known conflicts and the choice it makes, so you can judge the method instead of guessing at it.
| Conflict | The disagreement | This encyclopedia's choice |
|---|---|---|
| Cup chart mapping | Sources map 6 and 9 inches differently: F/I in one chart, DDD-F and HH-I in another. | The cup chart uses the DDD/F and HH/I mappings, which are more commonly seen in US sizing. Both versions are noted on the charts page. |
| Band support percentage | Sources cite 70%, 80%, 80–90%, or 90% of support from the band. | "Commonly cited as 80 to 90 percent." The exact figure varies by style, body, and construction; the principle that the band provides most support is consistent. |
| Band rounding method | Nearest-even rounding vs a nuanced all-six-measurements algorithm. | Nearest-even is presented as a simplification, with the ABTF calculator recommended for tailored results. |
| US vs UK cup sizing | The two systems match through DD and diverge above it. | Charts show both columns; check which system a brand uses before buying internationally. |
| Cup calculation basis | Cup calculated from the raw average underbust vs the rounded band size. | The rounded band size, the more common method. If you are between cup sizes, try both and see which fits better. |
Skip the rounding arguments entirely
Radical's scan measures you from two photos on your phone, then builds the band to your actual ribcage and each cup to its own side, so no rounding rule has to make the call for you.
Start your fit